SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SGLD.L (Invesco Physical Gold ETC) and SGLS.L (Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SGLD.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while SGLS.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGLD.L returned 18.44%/yr vs 15.96%/yr for SGLS.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGLD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SGLS.L.

Performance

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGLD.L is traded in USD, while SGLS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLD.L achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly higher than SGLS.L's 2.13% return.

SGLD.L

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -4.24%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 6M: 5.09%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: 31.13%
• 5Y*: 18.44%
• 10Y*: 13.39%

SGLS.L

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -5.31%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 30.05%
• 3Y*: 32.35%
• 5Y*: 15.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SGLD.L Invesco Physical Gold ETC	3.01%	64.87%	26.23%	13.36%	-0.08%	-4.08%	-3.11%
SGLS.L Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC	2.13%	76.07%	22.71%	17.37%	-11.75%	-4.62%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLD.L and SGLS.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020	0.78

The correlation between SGLD.L and SGLS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLD.L

SGLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
SGLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SGLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SGLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
SGLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

SGLS.L

SGLS.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SGLS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SGLS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SGLS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SGLS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGLD.L	SGLS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.11	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.55	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.21	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	1.48	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.86	3.70	+1.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SGLS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLD.L and SGLS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGLD.L	SGLS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.11	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.07	0.79	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.75	-0.17

Drawdowns

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLD.L drawdown since its inception was -45.21%, which is greater than SGLS.L's maximum drawdown of -37.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLD.L and SGLS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGLD.L	SGLS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.21%	-37.85%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.34%	-20.20%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.34%	-20.20%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.12%	-35.79%	+14.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.19%	-18.82%	+2.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.20%	-10.14%	-8.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.64%	8.11%	-1.47%

Volatility

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Gold ETC (SGLD.L) is 6.38%, while Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that SGLD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGLD.L	SGLS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.38%	7.27%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.72%	23.31%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.73%	27.02%	-2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	22.36%	-5.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	22.82%	-7.32%

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGLD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLS.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGLD.L vs. SGLS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGLD.L nor SGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGLD.L and SGLS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, SGLD.L and SGLS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SGLD.L or SGLS.L?

On fees, SGLD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGLD.L or SGLS.L?

SGLD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SGLS.L.

What is the main difference between SGLD.L and SGLS.L?

SGLD.L is categorized as Gold, while SGLS.L is Precious Metals. SGLD.L tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SGLD.L and 0.34% for SGLS.L.