TRET.L vs. DTRE.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and DTRE.L (First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist) are both REIT funds - TRET.L tracks the GPR Global 100 Index while DTRE.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRET.L returned 10.72%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for DTRE.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DTRE.L.

Performance

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TRET.L is traded in USD, while DTRE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the DTRE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than DTRE.L's 6.37% return.

TRET.L

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -3.52%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 3.63%
• 1Y: 10.56%
• 3Y*: 10.72%
• 5Y*: 2.29%
• 10Y*: —

DTRE.L

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.72%
• YTD: 6.37%
• 6M: 8.54%
• 1Y: 9.32%
• 3Y*: 4.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.80%	14.43%	1.05%	13.94%	-23.65%
DTRE.L First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist	6.37%	7.73%	-11.00%	12.84%	-25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.L and DTRE.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2022	0.83

The correlation between TRET.L and DTRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TRET.L	DTRE.L
Real Estate	99.9%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.L

TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

DTRE.L

DTRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
DTRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
DTRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
DTRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
DTRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DTRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRET.L	DTRE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.70	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.29	1.10	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.12	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	0.95	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	3.03	+0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the DTRE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.L and DTRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRET.L	DTRE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85	0.70	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	-0.19	+0.41

Drawdowns

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, which is greater than DTRE.L's maximum drawdown of -35.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and DTRE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRET.L	DTRE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.26%	-35.46%	-6.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.49%	-9.80%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-20.93%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-15.46%	+9.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.96%	-21.81%	+9.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.06%	-0.08%

Volatility

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) is 4.02%, while First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist (DTRE.L) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that TRET.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRET.L	DTRE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	4.66%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	9.84%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	13.30%	-0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	18.12%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.18%	18.12%	+1.06%

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DTRE.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRET.L vs. DTRE.L - Dividend Comparison

TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than DTRE.L's 2.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DTRE.L First Trust Alerian Disruptive Technology Real Estate UCITS ETF Dist	2.61%	2.74%	2.42%	2.20%	1.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	4.51%	3.54%	3.56%	3.54%	4.56%	1.86%	4.18%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRET.L and DTRE.L in my portfolio?

TRET.L and DTRE.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRET.L or DTRE.L?

On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRET.L or DTRE.L?

TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DTRE.L.

What is the main difference between TRET.L and DTRE.L?

TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while DTRE.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.60% for DTRE.L.