PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TRET.L vs. HPRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - TRET.L tracks the GPR Global 100 Index while HPRD.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.L returned 2.29%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for HPRD.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TRET.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.

Performance

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.L achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than HPRD.L's 6.46% return.

TRET.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
3.80%
6M
3.63%
1Y
10.56%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
—

HPRD.L

1D
0.07%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
6.46%
6M
6.98%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
3.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		3.80%14.43%1.05%13.94%-25.68%29.73%-6.91%10.01%
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF		6.46%10.90%-0.19%10.88%-24.76%26.43%-8.89%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.L and HPRD.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.97

The correlation between TRET.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TRET.L
HPRD.L

Real Estate

99.9%
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

0.3%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

TRET.L
99.9%
HPRD.L
98.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TRET.L
0.1%
HPRD.L
0.1%

Financial Services

TRET.L
0.0%
HPRD.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Communication Services

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Energy

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Healthcare

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Industrials

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Technology

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L
0.3%

Utilities

TRET.L

-

HPRD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF

Often compared with TRET.L:
TRET.L vs. DPYE.LTRET.L vs. BRNT.LTRET.L vs. DTRE.LTRET.L vs. QOZ.AXTRET.L vs. WNEW.LTRET.L vs. HPRO.LTRET.L vs. IASP.L
Often compared with HPRD.L:
HPRD.L vs. IWDP.ASHPRD.L vs. UKRE.LHPRD.L vs. IDVY.ASHPRD.L vs. VTHPRD.L vs. VNQHPRD.L vs. VUSA.LHPRD.L vs. VWCE.DE

Return for Risk

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TRET.L
TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
HPRD.L
HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TRET.LHPRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.85
0.99

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.29
1.50

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.18

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

4.35

-0.81

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.L and HPRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TRET.LHPRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.99

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.07

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.21

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.31

-0.09

Drawdowns

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.L drawdown since its inception was -42.26%, roughly equal to the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.L and HPRD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TRET.LHPRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.26%

-41.81%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-10.12%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-18.25%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.35%

-33.48%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-41.81%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-3.89%

-2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-9.44%

-2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.74%

+0.24%

Volatility

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) at 3.72%. This indicates that TRET.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TRET.LHPRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

3.72%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

9.35%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

11.99%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

16.32%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.18%

16.93%

+2.25%

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRET.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison

TRET.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than HPRD.L's 3.07% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HPRD.L
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF		3.07%3.17%3.39%3.35%3.53%2.30%2.88%2.96%3.43%2.89%3.13%2.72%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		4.51%3.54%3.56%3.54%4.56%1.86%4.18%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.95, TRET.L and HPRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.L.

TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index, while HPRD.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRET.L and HPRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer