PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TREG.L vs. TRET.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TREG.L vs. TRET.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TREG.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds from VanEck - TREG.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD while TRET.L tracks the GPR Global 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TREG.L returned 3.19%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for TRET.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREG.L is traded in GBP, while TRET.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRET.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREG.L achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.L's 4.19% return.

TREG.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
2.95%
6M
1.90%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
—

TRET.L

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
4.19%
6M
3.08%
1Y
11.33%
3Y*
7.98%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		2.95%6.62%2.78%7.64%-16.77%31.33%-10.04%10.49%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		4.19%6.27%2.82%8.24%-16.84%30.96%-9.65%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TREG.L and TRET.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.92

The correlation between TREG.L and TRET.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
TREG.L
TRET.L

Real Estate

98.4%
99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

TREG.L
98.4%
TRET.L
99.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TREG.L
0.1%
TRET.L
0.1%

Financial Services

TREG.L
0.0%
TRET.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Communication Services

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Consumer Defensive

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Energy

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Healthcare

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Industrials

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Technology

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Utilities

TREG.L

-

TRET.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

Often compared with TREG.L:
TREG.L vs. HPRO.LTREG.L vs. IWDP.ASTREG.L vs. EPRA.LTREG.L vs. BCHS.LTREG.L vs. PFFRTREG.L vs. BBOX.LTREG.L vs. VOO
Often compared with TRET.L:
TRET.L vs. DPYE.LTRET.L vs. BRNT.LTRET.L vs. DTRE.LTRET.L vs. QOZ.AXTRET.L vs. HPRD.LTRET.L vs. WNEW.LTRET.L vs. HPRO.L

Return for Risk

TREG.L vs. TRET.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
TRET.L
TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TREG.LTRET.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.89
0.90

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.34
1.34

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.25

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

3.95

-0.45

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the TRET.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREG.L and TRET.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TREG.LTRET.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.90

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.22

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.20

+0.03

Drawdowns

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.66%, roughly equal to the maximum TRET.L drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREG.L and TRET.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TREG.LTRET.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.66%

-36.12%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-9.00%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.30%

-15.30%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

-27.34%

+0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-5.67%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-10.56%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.86%

+0.03%

Volatility

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) is 3.46%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that TREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TREG.LTRET.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.66%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

10.05%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

12.50%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

15.62%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.77%

-0.80%

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TREG.L and TRET.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TREG.L vs. TRET.L - Dividend Comparison

TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, less than TRET.L's 4.51% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		3.43%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF		4.51%3.54%3.56%3.54%4.56%1.86%4.18%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.91, TREG.L and TRET.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREG.L and TRET.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

TREG.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREG.L and TRET.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer