TREG.L vs. BCHS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L).
TREG.L and BCHS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TREG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. BCHS.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Mar 8, 2019. Both TREG.L and BCHS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TREG.L or BCHS.L.
Key characteristics
| TREG.L | BCHS.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.47% | 7.97% |
| 1Y Return | 24.32% | 58.60% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 53.77% | -5.48% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 30.91% | 17.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.78 | 0.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.63 | 1.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.26 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.94 | 1.14 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.61 | 2.86 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.36% | 20.41% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.39% | 65.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.32% | -55.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.55% | -23.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TREG.L and BCHS.L is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TREG.L achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 7.97% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison
TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 233.56%, while BCHS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TREG.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 233.56% | 258.75% | 147.22% | 44.99% | 4.49% |
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TREG.L drawdown since its inception was -44.32%, smaller than the maximum BCHS.L drawdown of -55.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREG.L and BCHS.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TREG.L vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) is 2.89%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that TREG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.