PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDA vs. CI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRDA vs. CI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Entrada Therapeutics, Inc. (TRDA) and The Cigna Group (CI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDA achieves a -33.95% return, which is significantly lower than CI's 2.54% return.


TRDA

1D
0.30%
1M
-12.05%
6M
-40.65%
YTD
-33.95%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
-26.27%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-24.91%

CI

1D
-2.99%
1M
-3.03%
6M
2.96%
YTD
2.54%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
-0.02%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.54%
ALL TIME*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$460.57M$474.33M$477.27M
$3.07M$2.97M$3.45M

TRDA vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRDA
Entrada Therapeutics, Inc.
-33.95%-40.54%14.58%11.61%-21.03%-35.40%
CI
The Cigna Group
2.54%1.72%-6.27%-7.97%46.68%6.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDA and CI is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRDA:

$263.59M

CI:

$73.82B

EPS

TRDA:

-$4.00

CI:

$24.16

PS Ratio

TRDA:

49.18

CI:

0.26

PB Ratio

TRDA:

1.05

CI:

1.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRDA:

$5.74M

CI:

$282.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRDA:

-$34.38M

CI:

$17.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

TRDA:

-$172.23M

CI:

$9.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDA vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRDA
TRDA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TRDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRDA vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entrada Therapeutics, Inc. (TRDA) and The Cigna Group (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRDACIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

0.31

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

0.74

-0.20

TRDA vs. CI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is comparable to the CI Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDA and CI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRDA vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDA drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, roughly equal to the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDA and CI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDACIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.66%

-84.34%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.75%

-21.41%

-43.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.75%

-32.10%

-44.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.60%

-21.16%

-59.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-18.82%

-44.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.89%

9.02%

+19.87%

Volatility

TRDA vs. CI - Volatility Comparison

Entrada Therapeutics, Inc. (TRDA) has a higher volatility of 20.66% compared to The Cigna Group (CI) at 10.65%. This indicates that TRDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDACIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.66%

10.65%

+10.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

97.02%

20.43%

+76.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.69%

33.83%

+52.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

89.50%

28.73%

+60.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.50%

30.70%

+58.80%

Dividends

TRDA vs. CI - Dividend Comparison

TRDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
The Cigna Group
2.20%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
TRDA
Entrada Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TRDA vs. CI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Entrada Therapeutics, Inc. and The Cigna Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRDA and CI have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRDA has higher volatility (20.66%) compared to CI (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRDA dropped -85.66% vs CI's -84.34%.

CI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDA and CI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer