PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRCSX vs. FDSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRCSX achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than FDSCX's 15.95% return.


TRCSX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.98%
YTD
18.68%
6M
17.42%
1Y
41.07%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*

FDSCX

1D
0.84%
1M
1.01%
YTD
15.95%
6M
14.53%
1Y
38.89%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
12.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
18.68%12.72%11.36%16.97%-20.47%4.05%
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
15.95%14.33%14.51%19.46%-18.28%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TRCSX and FDSCX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.93

The correlation between TRCSX and FDSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRCSX vs. FDSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRCSX
TRCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TRCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TRCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSCX
FDSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) and Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRCSXFDSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.39

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

4.12

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.85

16.04

-0.19

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRCSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FDSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRCSX and FDSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRCSXFDSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.32

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.42

-0.08

Drawdowns

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRCSX drawdown since its inception was -31.94%, smaller than the maximum FDSCX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRCSX and FDSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRCSXFDSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.94%

-65.47%

+33.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.96%

-10.04%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.82%

-27.42%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.94%

-30.56%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-1.74%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-11.23%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.57%

+0.44%

Volatility

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund (TRCSX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund (FDSCX) at 5.23%. This indicates that TRCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRCSXFDSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.23%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.60%

13.36%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

17.85%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.15%

21.63%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

21.87%

+1.23%

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRCSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FDSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRCSX vs. FDSCX - Dividend Comparison

TRCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than FDSCX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSCX
Fidelity Stock Selector Small Cap Fund
0.62%0.72%2.71%0.23%0.12%10.85%1.40%2.13%22.39%10.02%1.63%7.06%
TRCSX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Index Fund
2.02%2.39%3.18%1.27%1.58%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRCSX and FDSCX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRCSX has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to FDSCX (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRCSX dropped -31.94% vs FDSCX's -65.47%.

TRCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRCSX and FDSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer