PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRAK vs. WS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRAK vs. WS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Worthington Steel Inc (WS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRAK achieves a -23.72% return, which is significantly lower than WS's 26.59% return.


TRAK

1D
-3.09%
1M
4.32%
YTD
-23.72%
6M
-29.47%
1Y
-54.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WS

1D
0.25%
1M
8.21%
YTD
26.59%
6M
22.31%
1Y
74.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRAK vs. WS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
-23.72%-43.84%19.37%
WS
Worthington Steel Inc
26.59%11.18%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TRAK and WS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRAK:

$177.27M

WS:

$2.16B

EPS

TRAK:

$104.56

WS:

$2.44

PE Ratio

TRAK:

0.09

WS:

17.82

PEG Ratio

TRAK:

0.00

WS:

17.31

PS Ratio

TRAK:

0.03

WS:

0.65

PB Ratio

TRAK:

0.00

WS:

22.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRAK:

$5.90B

WS:

$3.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRAK:

$5.09B

WS:

$411.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRAK:

$1.63B

WS:

$216.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRAK vs. WS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRAK
TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WS
WS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
WS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRAK vs. WS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) and Worthington Steel Inc (WS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRAKWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.29

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.78

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

5.16

-6.52

TRAK vs. WS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRAK Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the WS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRAK and WS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRAK vs. WS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRAK drawdown since its inception was -70.93%, which is greater than WS's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRAK and WS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRAKWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.93%

-50.98%

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.97%

-42.00%

-22.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.64%

-9.99%

-51.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.38%

-21.81%

-10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.10%

14.48%

+26.62%

Volatility

TRAK vs. WS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Park City Group Inc (TRAK) is 10.36%, while Worthington Steel Inc (WS) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that TRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRAKWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.36%

11.90%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.40%

35.08%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.02%

49.54%

-6.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.65%

52.31%

-11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.65%

52.31%

-11.66%

Dividends

TRAK vs. WS - Dividend Comparison

TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than WS's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
TRAK
Park City Group Inc
0.83%0.62%0.16%
WS
Worthington Steel Inc
1.84%1.85%2.01%

Financials

TRAK vs. WS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Park City Group Inc and Worthington Steel Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.88B
769.80M
(TRAK) Total Revenue
(WS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRAK vs. WS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Park City Group Inc and Worthington Steel Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
86.3%
9.9%
Portfolio components
TRAK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a gross profit of 5.08B and revenue of 5.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

WS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a gross profit of 76.10M and revenue of 769.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.9%.

TRAK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported an operating income of 2.25B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

WS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported an operating income of -1.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.2%.

TRAK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park City Group Inc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 5.88B, resulting in a net margin of 33.8%.

WS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a net income of 10.40M and revenue of 769.80M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRAK and WS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WS has higher volatility (11.90%) compared to TRAK (10.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRAK dropped -70.93% vs WS's -50.98%.

WS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRAK and WS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer