TQQY vs. LFGY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TQQY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TQQY is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while LFGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TQQY returned 4.89% vs -9.94% for LFGY. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TQQY charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LFGY.

Performance

TQQY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQY achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 8.72% return.

TQQY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.72%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 1Y: 4.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.10%

LFGY

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 1Y: -9.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	3.32%	-6.04%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	8.72%	10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQY and LFGY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025	0.61

The correlation between TQQY and LFGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQQY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQY

TQQY Risk / Return Rank: 14
TQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
TQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 14

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 8
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQQY	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	-0.25	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	-0.09	+0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.99	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.28	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	-0.58	+1.18

TQQY vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQY and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQQY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQY drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQY and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQQY	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.06%	-35.94%	+9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.35%	-35.94%	+16.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-16.95%	+9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.70%	-14.06%	+4.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	17.19%	-8.99%

Volatility

TQQY vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF (TQQY) is 3.72%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that TQQY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQQY	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.72%	11.39%	-7.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	32.38%	-18.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.39%	39.55%	-18.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.28%	42.27%	-18.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.28%	42.27%	-18.99%

TQQY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LFGY's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQQY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

TQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 61.18%, less than LFGY's 85.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.09%	94.90%
TQQY GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF	61.18%	49.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQQY and LFGY in my portfolio?

TQQY and LFGY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TQQY or LFGY?

LFGY has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to TQQY (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQY dropped -26.06% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, TQQY or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, TQQY leads with 4.89% vs -9.94% for LFGY. On fees, LFGY is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, TQQY has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TQQY or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, TQQY has performed better with a 4.89% return vs -9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TQQY or LFGY?

LFGY is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TQQY or LFGY?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.09%, compared with 61.18% for TQQY.

What is the main difference between TQQY and LFGY?

TQQY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while LFGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TQQY and 1.02% for LFGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.