PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 64.46% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 45.33%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.56% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and VOO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.90

The correlation between TQQQ and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
VOO

Technology

53.8%
35.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.5%

Industrials

2.8%
8.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
VOO
4.9%

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TQQQVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.43

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.16

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.27

14.73

-2.46

TQQQ vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TQQQVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.39

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.83

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.87

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.89

-0.15

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-33.99%

-47.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-8.90%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-18.69%

-39.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-24.52%

-57.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-33.99%

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.70%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-3.69%

-14.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

1.91%

+9.37%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 13.29% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

2.84%

+10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

8.90%

+27.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.60%

11.80%

+35.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.53%

16.81%

+49.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.96%

18.01%

+47.95%

TQQQ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TQQQ and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 15.56% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 15.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.03% for VOO.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer