PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TQQQ vs. IWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TQQQ vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQQQ achieves a 36.47% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TQQQ has outperformed IWY with an annualized return of 44.95%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively lower 19.21% annualized return.


TQQQ

1D
-4.16%
1M
-15.05%
YTD
36.47%
6M
30.08%
1Y
77.18%
3Y*
55.74%
5Y*
20.68%
10Y*
44.95%

IWY

1D
0.80%
1M
-7.16%
YTD
0.62%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
21.88%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
19.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQQQ vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
36.47%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.62%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TQQQ and IWY is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.96

The correlation between TQQQ and IWY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TQQQ vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TQQQ
IWY

Technology

53.8%
56.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
2.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
7.1%

Industrials

2.8%
3.4%

Utilities

1.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.3%

Energy

0.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
5.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.3%

Technology

TQQQ
53.8%
IWY
56.3%

Communication Services

TQQQ
15.8%
IWY
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

TQQQ
12.3%
IWY
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

TQQQ
7.7%
IWY
2.9%

Healthcare

TQQQ
4.2%
IWY
7.1%

Industrials

TQQQ
2.8%
IWY
3.4%

Utilities

TQQQ
1.4%
IWY
1.1%

Basic Materials

TQQQ
1.1%
IWY
0.3%

Energy

TQQQ
0.6%
IWY
0.0%

Financial Services

TQQQ
0.2%
IWY
5.5%

Real Estate

TQQQ
0.1%
IWY
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TQQQ vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQQQ vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TQQQIWYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

0.89

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

2.80

+3.95

TQQQ vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQQQ and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TQQQ vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQQQ drawdown since its inception was -81.66%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQQQ and IWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TQQQIWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.66%

-32.68%

-48.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

-16.63%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

-23.22%

-34.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

-32.68%

-48.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

-32.68%

-48.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.65%

-7.85%

-9.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-4.75%

-13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

5.29%

+6.43%

Volatility

TQQQ vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a higher volatility of 27.08% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 6.21%. This indicates that TQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TQQQIWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.08%

6.21%

+20.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.49%

12.61%

+30.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.41%

16.29%

+37.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.42%

21.60%

+45.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.28%

21.02%

+45.26%

TQQQ vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TQQQ vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than IWY's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.29%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TQQQ and IWY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.08%) compared to IWY (6.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQQQ dropped -81.66% vs IWY's -32.68%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 19.21% for IWY. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 6.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 19.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

IWY has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.29% for TQQQ.

TQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%), while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TQQQ and 0.20% for IWY.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TQQQ and IWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer