TPZ vs. RCTR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and RCTR (First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise, while RCTR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index. TPZ is actively managed, while RCTR is passively managed. Over the past year, TPZ returned 3.96% vs 12.44% for RCTR. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for RCTR.

Performance

TPZ vs. RCTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly higher than RCTR's 5.24% return.

TPZ

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 3.90%
• YTD: 6.91%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 18.69%
• 10Y*: 8.30%
• ALL TIME*: 7.92%

RCTR

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: -6.36%
• YTD: 5.24%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	$78.44K	$113.50K	$257.71K
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	$293.05K	$219.78K	$220.84K

TPZ vs. RCTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	6.91%	-0.91%
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	5.24%	6.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TPZ and RCTR is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

TPZ vs. RCTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPZ

TPZ Risk / Return Rank: 17
TPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
TPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 19

RCTR

RCTR Risk / Return Rank: 20
RCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
RCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
RCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
RCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPZ vs. RCTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPZ	RCTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	0.47	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	0.83	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.10	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	0.66	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	1.57	-0.19

TPZ vs. RCTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the RCTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPZ and RCTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPZ vs. RCTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than RCTR's maximum drawdown of -18.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and RCTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPZ	RCTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.17%	-18.98%	-59.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-18.98%	+12.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.57%	-12.40%	+6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-6.14%	-5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	7.95%	-4.96%

Volatility

TPZ vs. RCTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) is 4.75%, while First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that TPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPZ	RCTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	8.37%	-3.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.20%	20.50%	-9.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	26.94%	-12.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.67%	26.90%	-9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.73%	26.90%	+0.83%

TPZ vs. RCTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RCTR's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPZ vs. RCTR - Dividend Comparison

TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than RCTR's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCTR First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF	0.61%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF	3.49%	3.99%	5.88%	8.99%	9.52%	4.77%	8.80%	8.84%	9.41%	7.28%	6.88%	9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPZ and RCTR in my portfolio?

TPZ and RCTR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPZ or RCTR?

RCTR has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to TPZ (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs RCTR's -18.98%.

Which ETF is better, TPZ or RCTR?

On 1-year performance, RCTR leads with 12.44% vs 3.96% for TPZ. On fees, RCTR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TPZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPZ or RCTR?

Over the 1-year period, RCTR has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPZ or RCTR?

RCTR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPZ or RCTR?

TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.61% for RCTR.

What is the main difference between TPZ and RCTR?

TPZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while RCTR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.70% for RCTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.