TPZ vs. LNGX
TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and LNGX (Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by Tortoise, while LNGX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Global X U.S. Natural Gas Index. TPZ is actively managed, while LNGX is passively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LNGX.
Performance
TPZ vs. LNGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than LNGX's 19.16% return.
TPZ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
LNGX
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $516.11K | $452.23K | $582.26K | |
| $293.05K | $219.78K | $220.84K |
TPZ vs. LNGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 6.91% | -2.27% |
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 19.16% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPZ and LNGX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPZ vs. LNGX — Risk / Return Rank
TPZ
LNGX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPZ vs. LNGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF (LNGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPZ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPZ vs. LNGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than LNGX's maximum drawdown of -17.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and LNGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPZ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -17.89% | -60.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.57% | -12.32% | +6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -6.48% | -5.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility
TPZ vs. LNGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPZ | LNGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 25.03% | -10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 25.03% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 25.03% | +2.70% |
TPZ vs. LNGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LNGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPZ vs. LNGX - Dividend Comparison
TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than LNGX's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNGX Global X U.S. Natural Gas ETF | 0.83% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 3.49% | 3.99% | 5.88% | 8.99% | 9.52% | 4.77% | 8.80% | 8.84% | 9.41% | 7.28% | 6.88% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPZ and LNGX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LNGX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LNGX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.
TPZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.83% for LNGX.
TPZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while LNGX is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.45% for LNGX.
Find the right allocation for TPZ and LNGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer