TPZ vs. BILT
TPZ (Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TPZ returned 3.96% vs 16.62% for BILT. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPZ charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
TPZ vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPZ achieves a 6.91% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 14.26% return.
TPZ
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 3.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $584.88K | $1.63M | $1.70M | |
| $293.05K | $219.78K | $220.84K |
TPZ vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 6.91% | -0.91% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 14.26% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPZ and BILT is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.60 |
The correlation between TPZ and BILT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPZ vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
TPZ
BILT
TPZ vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPZ | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.29 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.10 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 9.27 | -7.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPZ vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPZ drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPZ and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPZ | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -5.38% | -72.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -5.38% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.57% | -2.28% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.85% | -1.37% | -10.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 1.80% | +1.19% |
Volatility
TPZ vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF (TPZ) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) at 2.64%. This indicates that TPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPZ | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 2.64% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 8.42% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 10.31% | +3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.67% | 10.29% | +7.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 10.29% | +17.44% |
TPZ vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPZ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPZ vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
TPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than BILT's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.70% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPZ Tortoise Electrification Infrastructure ETF | 3.49% | 3.99% | 5.88% | 8.99% | 9.52% | 4.77% | 8.80% | 8.84% | 9.41% | 7.28% | 6.88% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPZ and BILT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPZ has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to BILT (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPZ dropped -78.17% vs BILT's -5.38%.
On 1-year performance, BILT leads with 16.62% vs 3.96% for TPZ. On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILT has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TPZ.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 3.49% for TPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TPZ and 0.60% for BILT.
BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPZ and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer