PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPYP vs. HAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPYP vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 18.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPYP having a 11.89% annualized return and HAP not far behind at 11.44%.


TPYP

1D
0.37%
1M
2.75%
6M
15.48%
YTD
23.68%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
19.53%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
9.80%

HAP

1D
-1.03%
1M
2.81%
6M
5.60%
YTD
18.12%
1Y
39.17%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
11.44%
ALL TIME*
5.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.89M$2.98M$2.39M
$2.50M$2.27M$2.65M

TPYP vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
23.68%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
18.12%34.91%-4.08%2.46%7.84%25.04%6.30%18.60%-10.68%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and HAP is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and HAP has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TPYP vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPYP
HAP

Energy

69.6%
28.7%

Utilities

21.2%
9.8%

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Industrials

0.1%
11.6%

Basic Materials

0.1%
38.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.3%

Healthcare

-

3.8%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

-

1.0%

Energy

TPYP
69.6%
HAP
28.7%

Utilities

TPYP
21.2%
HAP
9.8%

Financial Services

TPYP
2.4%
HAP

-

Industrials

TPYP
0.1%
HAP
11.6%

Basic Materials

TPYP
0.1%
HAP
38.2%

Communication Services

TPYP

-

HAP

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPYP

-

HAP
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

TPYP

-

HAP
6.3%

Healthcare

TPYP

-

HAP
3.8%

Real Estate

TPYP

-

HAP
0.4%

Technology

TPYP

-

HAP
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPYP vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HAP
HAP Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPYP vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPYPHAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

4.28

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

12.10

-3.30

TPYP vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, roughly equal to the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and HAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPYPHAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-50.99%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-9.09%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-16.92%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-25.66%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-44.07%

-7.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-4.67%

+1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-12.03%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.21%

-0.32%

Volatility

TPYP vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.08%. This indicates that TPYP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPYPHAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

4.08%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

12.98%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

15.67%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.40%

18.21%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

19.67%

+2.23%

TPYP vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPYP vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than HAP's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
1.92%2.27%2.65%3.27%3.28%2.16%2.45%2.80%2.85%2.02%1.99%3.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.19%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPYP and HAP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPYP has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to HAP (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs HAP's -50.99%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.89% vs 11.44% for HAP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.92% for HAP.

TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.42% for HAP.

HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPYP and HAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer