TPYP vs. HAP
TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TPYP tracks the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPYP returned 11.89%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for HAP. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPYP charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.
Performance
TPYP vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 18.12% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPYP having a 11.89% annualized return and HAP not far behind at 11.44%.
TPYP
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 25.52%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- 19.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
HAP
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 18.12%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.25%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89M | $2.98M | $2.39M | |
| $2.50M | $2.27M | $2.65M |
TPYP vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 23.68% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 18.12% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPYP and HAP is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and HAP has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
TPYP vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPYP
HAP
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
TPYP
HAP
Utilities
TPYP
HAP
Financial Services
TPYP
HAP
-
Industrials
TPYP
HAP
Basic Materials
TPYP
HAP
Communication Services
TPYP
-
HAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
TPYP
-
HAP
Consumer Defensive
TPYP
-
HAP
Healthcare
TPYP
-
HAP
Real Estate
TPYP
-
HAP
Technology
TPYP
-
HAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPYP vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
TPYP
HAP
TPYP vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPYP | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 4.28 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.80 | 12.10 | -3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPYP vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, roughly equal to the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPYP | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.91% | -50.99% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -9.09% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.17% | -16.92% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -25.66% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.91% | -44.07% | -7.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.89% | -4.67% | +1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -12.03% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.21% | -0.32% |
Volatility
TPYP vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a higher volatility of 5.37% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.08%. This indicates that TPYP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPYP | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 4.08% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.25% | 12.98% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 15.67% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 18.21% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 19.67% | +2.23% |
TPYP vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPYP vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than HAP's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.92% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.19% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPYP and HAP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPYP has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to HAP (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs HAP's -50.99%.
On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.89% vs 11.44% for HAP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 1.92% for HAP.
TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.42% for HAP.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPYP and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer