PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPYP vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPYP vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 22.03% return, which is significantly higher than ANGL's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 12.22%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 6.28% annualized return.


TPYP

1D
0.86%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
22.03%
6M
22.42%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
12.22%

ANGL

1D
0.03%
1M
1.57%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.30%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
6.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPYP vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
22.03%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.87%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and ANGL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015

0.41

The correlation between TPYP and ANGL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPYP vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPYP vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPYPANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

1.85

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

7.72

+1.42

TPYP vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPYPANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-29.31%

-22.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-4.05%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-5.48%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-19.25%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-29.31%

-22.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.72%

0.00%

-3.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-3.29%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

0.97%

+1.67%

Volatility

TPYP vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 1.45%. This indicates that TPYP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPYPANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

1.45%

+3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

3.54%

+6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

4.37%

+8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.46%

7.63%

+9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

9.28%

+12.65%

TPYP vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPYP vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than ANGL's 6.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.35%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.20%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPYP and ANGL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPYP has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to ANGL (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 12.22% vs 6.28% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 6.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 3.20% for TPYP.

TPYP is categorized as Energy Equities, while ANGL is High Yield Bonds. TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.35% for ANGL.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPYP and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer