TPOR vs. OOQB
TPOR (Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPOR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Transportation Average Index (300%), while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. TPOR is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, TPOR returned 72.44% vs -27.35% for OOQB. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPOR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
TPOR vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than OOQB's -18.43% return.
TPOR
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 22.42%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 24.20%
- 1Y
- 72.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPOR vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares | 28.21% | -14.42% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -18.43% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPOR and OOQB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPOR vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
TPOR
OOQB
TPOR vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TPOR | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | -0.53 | +1.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | -0.50 | +2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.94 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.51 | +2.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | -0.91 | +6.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TPOR | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | -0.53 | +1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.41 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
TPOR vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPOR drawdown since its inception was -87.59%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPOR and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPOR | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.59% | -53.44% | -34.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.00% | -53.44% | +19.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.66% | -43.69% | +12.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.70% | -23.26% | -15.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.98% | 30.11% | -18.13% |
Volatility
TPOR vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares (TPOR) has a higher volatility of 16.85% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that TPOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPOR | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.85% | 0.00% | +16.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.80% | 39.39% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.27% | 51.57% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.75% | 58.12% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.94% | 58.12% | +12.82% |
TPOR vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPOR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPOR vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
TPOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPOR Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X Shares | 0.71% | 0.91% | 1.43% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 0.96% | 1.22% | 8.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPOR and OOQB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TPOR has higher volatility (16.85%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPOR dropped -87.59% vs OOQB's -53.44%.
On 1-year performance, TPOR leads with 72.44% vs -27.35% for OOQB. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TPOR has performed better with a 72.44% return vs -27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TPOR.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.71% for TPOR.
TPOR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TPOR and 0.75% for OOQB.
TPOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPOR and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer