PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLGX vs. SWLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLGX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's 7.13% return.


TPLGX

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.35%
YTD
4.02%
6M
3.53%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.52%

SWLGX

1D
-1.37%
1M
5.09%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.28%
1Y
25.25%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
15.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
4.02%18.66%35.22%49.63%-38.49%17.84%34.70%30.15%2.18%-0.80%
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
7.13%18.55%33.30%42.67%-29.17%27.55%38.43%36.30%-1.59%-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLGX and SWLGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.97

The correlation between TPLGX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLGX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLGX
TPLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TPLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SWLGX
SWLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
SWLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SWLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLGXSWLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.60

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

5.38

-1.45

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the SWLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLGX and SWLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLGXSWLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.67

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.72

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.79

-0.23

Drawdowns

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLGX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLGX and SWLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLGXSWLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.57%

-32.69%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.15%

-16.16%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.23%

-23.30%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.45%

-32.69%

-10.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-1.73%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-7.05%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

4.80%

+0.34%

Volatility

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.67%. This indicates that TPLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLGXSWLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.67%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

11.67%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

15.46%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

21.50%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

22.68%

+0.22%

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLGX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison

TPLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.52%, more than SWLGX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWLGX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund
0.43%0.46%0.52%0.67%0.93%1.76%0.67%0.96%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
19.52%20.30%12.87%3.70%4.39%8.81%0.59%0.60%1.65%1.39%0.25%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TPLGX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TPLGX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to SWLGX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLGX dropped -54.57% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.

SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLGX and SWLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer