TPLGX vs. FOCSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TPLGX (T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund) and FOCSX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund) are both mutual funds - TPLGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while FOCSX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, TPLGX returned 7.84%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for FOCSX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPLGX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FOCSX.

Performance

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLGX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FOCSX's 21.12% return.

TPLGX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.38%
• 6M: -1.19%
• YTD: -3.11%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 18.58%
• 5Y*: 7.84%
• 10Y*: 15.32%
• ALL TIME*: 11.63%

FOCSX

• 1D: 2.50%
• 1M: -3.15%
• 6M: 16.48%
• YTD: 21.12%
• 1Y: 36.84%
• 3Y*: 19.14%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOCSX Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund	-3.11%	18.66%	35.22%	49.63%	-38.49%	17.84%	34.70%	30.15%	2.18%	16.18%
FOCSX Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund	21.12%	11.33%	21.04%	19.62%	-25.01%	10.50%	37.44%	36.25%	-4.60%	16.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLGX and FOCSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.77

The correlation between TPLGX and FOCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TPLGX vs. FOCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPLGX

TPLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8
TPLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TPLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TPLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TPLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TPLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

FOCSX

FOCSX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FOCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FOCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FOCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FOCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FOCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPLGX	FOCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	1.45	-1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	2.05	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	2.55	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	9.55	-8.90

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the FOCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLGX and FOCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLGX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than FOCSX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLGX and FOCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPLGX	FOCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.57%	-38.79%	-15.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.15%	-12.98%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.23%	-28.51%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.45%	-38.79%	-4.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.78%	-5.30%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-10.80%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.73%	3.47%	+2.26%

Volatility

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund (FOCSX) have volatilities of 5.88% and 5.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPLGX	FOCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	5.98%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	17.98%	-3.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	22.84%	-5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.54%	23.72%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.99%	23.59%	-0.60%

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCSX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPLGX vs. FOCSX - Dividend Comparison

TPLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.95%, more than FOCSX's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOCSX Fidelity Small Cap Growth K6 Fund	2.26%	2.74%	2.26%	0.23%	0.05%	31.03%	2.78%	0.00%	2.47%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund	20.95%	20.30%	12.87%	3.70%	4.39%	8.81%	0.59%	0.60%	1.65%	1.39%	0.25%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPLGX and FOCSX in my portfolio?

TPLGX and FOCSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPLGX or FOCSX?

FOCSX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to TPLGX (5.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLGX dropped -54.57% vs FOCSX's -38.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.