PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLGX vs. FOSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLGX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FOSCX's 25.16% return. Over the past 10 years, TPLGX has outperformed FOSCX with an annualized return of 15.32%, while FOSCX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.13% annualized return.


TPLGX

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.38%
6M
-1.19%
YTD
-3.11%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
15.32%
ALL TIME*
11.63%

FOSCX

1D
1.21%
1M
-0.38%
6M
16.10%
YTD
25.16%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
-3.11%18.66%35.22%49.63%-38.49%17.84%34.70%30.15%2.18%36.49%
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
25.16%-3.67%9.35%16.92%-13.17%32.03%1.21%23.18%-10.81%8.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLGX and FOSCX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2003

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between TPLGX and FOSCX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLGX vs. FOSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TPLGX
TPLGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
TPLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

FOSCX
FOSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FOSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FOSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLGXFOSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.26

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

2.74

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.64

7.58

-6.94

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the FOSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLGX and FOSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLGX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, roughly equal to the maximum FOSCX drawdown of -52.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLGX and FOSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLGXFOSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.57%

-52.57%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.15%

-9.16%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.23%

-29.00%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.45%

-29.00%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.45%

-40.05%

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.78%

-2.51%

-6.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-7.04%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

3.32%

+2.41%

Volatility

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Tributary Small Company Fund (FOSCX) at 4.17%. This indicates that TPLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLGXFOSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

4.17%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

11.81%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.59%

17.34%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.54%

20.59%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

21.84%

+1.15%

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FOSCX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLGX vs. FOSCX - Dividend Comparison

TPLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.95%, more than FOSCX's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOSCX
Tributary Small Company Fund
6.08%7.61%6.67%2.82%13.61%15.18%0.02%1.28%5.45%5.28%1.51%0.00%
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
20.95%20.30%12.87%3.70%4.39%8.81%0.59%0.60%1.65%1.39%0.25%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPLGX and FOSCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPLGX has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to FOSCX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLGX dropped -54.57% vs FOSCX's -52.57%.

FOSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLGX and FOSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer