PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLGX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLGX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 27.26% return.


TPLGX

1D
-1.40%
1M
3.35%
YTD
4.02%
6M
3.53%
1Y
19.45%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.52%

FOKFX

1D
-0.58%
1M
9.40%
YTD
27.26%
6M
25.91%
1Y
57.24%
3Y*
32.62%
5Y*
18.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
4.02%18.66%35.22%49.63%-38.49%17.84%34.70%10.01%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
27.26%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLGX and FOKFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.95

The correlation between TPLGX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLGX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLGX
TPLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TPLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLGXFOKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.53

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

4.69

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.92

19.45

-15.53

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLGX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLGXFOKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

3.19

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.79

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.96

-0.40

Drawdowns

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLGX drawdown since its inception was -54.57%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLGX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLGXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.57%

-37.26%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.15%

-12.53%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.23%

-24.81%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.45%

-37.26%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-0.58%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.67%

-9.19%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

3.01%

+2.13%

Volatility

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that TPLGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLGXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.72%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.09%

14.57%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

18.46%

-2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

23.01%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.90%

24.63%

-1.73%

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLGX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLGX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

TPLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.52%, more than FOKFX's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.30%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPLGX
T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund
19.52%20.30%12.87%3.70%4.39%8.81%0.59%0.60%1.65%1.39%0.25%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPLGX and FOKFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOKFX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to TPLGX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLGX dropped -54.57% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLGX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer