PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPLC vs. JHMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPLC vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPLC achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return.


TPLC

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.78%
6M
7.78%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*

JHMM

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.60%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPLC vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
8.78%7.08%13.10%15.17%-12.58%26.34%14.55%9.83%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.60%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%9.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TPLC and JHMM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2019

0.97

The correlation between TPLC and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPLC vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPLC
JHMM

Industrials

23.2%
19.4%

Technology

16.7%
17.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
15.3%

Utilities

11.6%
5.4%

Healthcare

9.3%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
11.0%

Energy

8.2%
5.4%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

0.3%
5.4%

Communication Services

0.2%
2.7%

Industrials

TPLC
23.2%
JHMM
19.4%

Technology

TPLC
16.7%
JHMM
17.2%

Financial Services

TPLC
11.8%
JHMM
15.3%

Utilities

TPLC
11.6%
JHMM
5.4%

Healthcare

TPLC
9.3%
JHMM
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TPLC
9.0%
JHMM
11.0%

Energy

TPLC
8.2%
JHMM
5.4%

Basic Materials

TPLC
5.9%
JHMM
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

TPLC
3.8%
JHMM
3.7%

Real Estate

TPLC
0.3%
JHMM
5.4%

Communication Services

TPLC
0.2%
JHMM
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPLC vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPLC
TPLC Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TPLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
TPLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPLC vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPLCJHMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

2.89

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

11.17

-5.23

TPLC vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPLC and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPLCJHMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.77

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.46

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.63

-0.07

Drawdowns

TPLC vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPLC drawdown since its inception was -38.02%, smaller than the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPLC and JHMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLCJHMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.02%

-40.71%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.58%

-8.64%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.18%

-21.88%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.63%

-24.10%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.24%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-5.43%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.23%

-0.10%

Volatility

TPLC vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC) is 2.70%, while John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that TPLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLCJHMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.81%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

10.47%

-2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.50%

14.12%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.32%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

19.60%

+0.29%

TPLC vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPLC has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPLC vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than JHMM's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
TPLC
Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund
0.84%0.89%0.88%0.89%1.06%0.61%0.81%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TPLC and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JHMM has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to TPLC (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPLC dropped -38.02% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.39% vs 8.22% for TPLC. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, TPLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.84% for TPLC.

TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TPLC and 0.42% for JHMM.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPLC and JHMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer