PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. VNOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. VNOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 26.65% return, which is significantly higher than VNOM's 16.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed VNOM with an annualized return of 35.75%, while VNOM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.22% annualized return.


TPL

1D
-4.26%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
26.65%
6M
29.97%
1Y
-2.18%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
35.75%

VNOM

1D
-1.55%
1M
-10.80%
YTD
16.06%
6M
13.71%
1Y
8.58%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
25.82%
10Y*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. VNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
26.65%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
16.06%-16.58%65.52%4.83%61.69%94.24%-50.69%0.66%19.60%55.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and VNOM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014

0.43

The correlation between TPL and VNOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TPL:

$25.04B

VNOM:

$7.92B

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

VNOM:

-$0.29

PS Ratio

TPL:

29.85

VNOM:

4.27

PB Ratio

TPL:

16.09

VNOM:

1.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

VNOM:

$1.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

VNOM:

$740.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

VNOM:

$1.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. VNOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VNOM
VNOM Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VNOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNOM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VNOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNOM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. VNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLVNOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.66

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

1.20

-1.34

TPL vs. VNOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the VNOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and VNOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. VNOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum VNOM drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and VNOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLVNOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-86.96%

+13.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.69%

-13.03%

-19.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-34.46%

-17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-34.46%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-86.96%

+21.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.47%

-15.99%

-20.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-31.64%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.20%

8.22%

+8.98%

Volatility

TPL vs. VNOM - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Viper Energy Partners LP (VNOM) at 7.25%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLVNOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

7.25%

+7.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.33%

20.01%

+18.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.12%

29.23%

+17.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.28%

35.89%

+10.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.14%

45.22%

+1.92%

Dividends

TPL vs. VNOM - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VNOM's 5.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.62%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%
VNOM
Viper Energy Partners LP
5.29%6.03%4.89%5.58%7.68%5.16%5.85%7.38%8.14%5.27%4.83%6.16%

Financials

TPL vs. VNOM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Viper Energy Partners LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
236.82M
496.00M
(TPL) Total Revenue
(VNOM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TPL vs. VNOM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Viper Energy Partners LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
51.4%
Portfolio components
TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VNOM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a gross profit of 255.00M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

VNOM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported an operating income of 238.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

VNOM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viper Energy Partners LP reported a net income of 97.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and VNOM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to VNOM (7.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs VNOM's -86.96%.

VNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.30 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and VNOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer