PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. PBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TPL vs. PBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 29.13% return, which is significantly lower than PBT's 51.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed PBT with an annualized return of 36.42%, while PBT has yielded a comparatively lower 20.05% annualized return.


TPL

1D
2.43%
1M
-7.85%
YTD
29.13%
6M
24.74%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
38.93%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
36.42%

PBT

1D
1.19%
1M
-17.52%
YTD
51.40%
6M
49.93%
1Y
116.28%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
42.01%
10Y*
20.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. PBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
29.13%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
51.40%56.75%-16.91%-42.84%166.22%218.45%-7.68%-29.15%-28.11%23.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and PBT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987

0.18

The correlation between TPL and PBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TPL:

$7.30

PBT:

$0.33

PE Ratio

TPL:

50.70

PBT:

76.34

PEG Ratio

TPL:

2.68

PBT:

1.02

PS Ratio

TPL:

30.43

PBT:

68.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

TPL:

$839.03M

PBT:

$13.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TPL:

$625.27M

PBT:

$13.06M

EBITDA (TTM)

TPL:

$690.06M

PBT:

$11.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. PBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

PBT
PBT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. PBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLPBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.41

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

6.02

-5.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

15.92

-15.53

TPL vs. PBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the PBT Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and PBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. PBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum PBT drawdown of -83.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and PBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLPBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-83.17%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.23%

-19.42%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-62.52%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-65.05%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-73.87%

+8.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.22%

-17.52%

-17.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-25.66%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.12%

7.33%

+8.79%

Volatility

TPL vs. PBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) is 14.87%, while Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT) has a volatility of 16.21%. This indicates that TPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLPBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.87%

16.21%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.20%

31.80%

+5.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.08%

43.15%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.24%

47.73%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.15%

42.86%

+4.29%

Dividends

TPL vs. PBT - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than PBT's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
1.39%1.92%4.92%4.30%4.56%2.28%7.10%10.80%11.20%7.09%5.38%6.81%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.61%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. PBT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and Permian Basin Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
236.82M
0
(TPL) Total Revenue
(PBT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and PBT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBT has higher volatility (16.21%) compared to TPL (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs PBT's -83.17%.

PBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and PBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer