PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPL vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPL vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 26.65% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.26% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 35.75%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 22.31% annualized return.


TPL

1D
-4.26%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
26.65%
6M
29.97%
1Y
-2.18%
3Y*
35.41%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
35.75%

QQQ

1D
3.14%
1M
4.95%
YTD
21.26%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
27.20%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
22.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
26.65%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and QQQ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.18

The correlation between TPL and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPL vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TPLQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

3.52

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.14

13.12

-13.26

TPL vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TPL vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPLQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.05%

-82.97%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.69%

-11.96%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.22%

-22.77%

-29.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.50%

-35.12%

-17.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.46%

-35.12%

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.47%

-0.29%

-36.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-32.75%

+5.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.20%

3.20%

+14.00%

Volatility

TPL vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 8.14%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPLQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

8.14%

+6.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.33%

14.12%

+24.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.12%

17.43%

+29.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.28%

22.59%

+23.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.14%

22.41%

+24.73%

Dividends

TPL vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.62%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPL and QQQ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to QQQ (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPL and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer