TPL vs. PG

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TPL (Texas Pacific Land Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. TPL operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, TPL returned 36.58%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TPL vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPL achieves a 32.28% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TPL has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 36.58%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.

TPL

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 32.28%
• 6M: 35.91%
• 1Y: 4.22%
• 3Y*: 38.06%
• 5Y*: 18.80%
• 10Y*: 36.58%

PG

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 5.93%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: 3.69%
• 5Y*: 4.73%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPL vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	32.28%	-21.61%	115.31%	-32.40%	91.29%	73.25%	-4.69%	44.58%	21.96%	51.18%
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	5.93%	-12.26%	17.25%	-0.86%	-5.05%	20.52%	14.15%	39.70%	3.57%	12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TPL and PG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987	0.05

The correlation between TPL and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TPL : $26.15B PG : $361.53B
EPS TPL : $7.30 PG : $5.23
PE Ratio TPL : 51.93 PG : 28.63
PEG Ratio TPL : 2.75 PG : 7.00
PS Ratio TPL : 31.17 PG : 4.20
PB Ratio TPL : 16.81 PG : 6.70
Total Revenue (TTM) TPL : $839.03M PG : $86.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) TPL : $625.27M PG : $43.64B
EBITDA (TTM) TPL : $690.06M PG : $22.63B

Return for Risk

TPL vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPL

TPL Risk / Return Rank: 45
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PG

PG Risk / Return Rank: 28
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPL vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPL	PG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	-0.30	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	-0.31	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.97	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	-0.37	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.25	-0.68	+0.93

TPL vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPL and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPL vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPL drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPL and PG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPL	PG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.05%	-54.25%	-18.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.68%	-15.52%	-16.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.22%	-21.15%	-31.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.50%	-23.77%	-28.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.46%	-23.77%	-41.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.65%	-13.29%	-20.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.27%	-12.16%	-15.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.08%	8.80%	+8.28%

Volatility

TPL vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 6.99%. This indicates that TPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPL	PG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.23%	6.99%	+7.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.06%	15.01%	+23.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.87%	18.78%	+28.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.25%	17.82%	+28.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.10%	19.05%	+28.05%

Dividends

TPL vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PG's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PG The Procter & Gamble Company	2.85%	2.91%	2.36%	2.55%	2.38%	2.08%	2.24%	2.37%	3.09%	2.98%	3.18%	3.31%
TPL Texas Pacific Land Corporation	0.60%	0.74%	1.37%	0.83%	1.37%	0.88%	2.20%	0.22%	0.55%	0.30%	0.10%	0.22%

Financials

TPL vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Texas Pacific Land Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPL and PG in my portfolio?

TPL and PG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPL or PG?

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to PG (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPL dropped -73.05% vs PG's -54.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.