TPINX vs. FKDNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TPINX (Templeton Global Bond Fund) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both mutual funds - TPINX is a Global Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKDNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, TPINX returned 0.22%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for FKDNX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPINX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.

Performance

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPINX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, TPINX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 0.22%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.24% annualized return.

TPINX

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 2.09%
• 5Y*: -1.02%
• 10Y*: 0.22%

FKDNX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 5.66%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 25.36%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 18.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	1.43%	15.02%	-11.95%	2.45%	-6.17%	-5.06%	-4.41%	0.63%	1.26%	2.36%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	12.20%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TPINX and FKDNX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 1986	0.20

Over the past year, TPINX and FKDNX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TPINX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPINX

TPINX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TPINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TPINX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 20
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TPINX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.44	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.95	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.25	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	1.43	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	4.46	-1.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPINX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPINX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TPINX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.44	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.41	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03	0.74	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.67	+0.10

Drawdowns

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPINX drawdown since its inception was -26.45%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPINX and FKDNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPINX	FKDNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.45%	-51.63%	+25.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-20.49%	+14.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-26.23%	+13.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.15%	-48.28%	+29.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.45%	-48.28%	+21.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.66%	-1.14%	-12.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-11.25%	+6.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	6.57%	-4.63%

Volatility

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Global Bond Fund (TPINX) is 2.23%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that TPINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPINX	FKDNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	4.99%	-2.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.97%	15.86%	-9.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.25%	20.41%	-13.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.13%	26.20%	-18.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.27%	24.61%	-17.34%

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPINX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPINX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

TPINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	9.95%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
TPINX Templeton Global Bond Fund	5.06%	4.29%	5.77%	3.87%	5.17%	5.38%	4.59%	6.12%	6.53%	3.34%	2.33%	3.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPINX and FKDNX in my portfolio?

TPINX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TPINX or FKDNX?

FKDNX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to TPINX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPINX dropped -26.45% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.