PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPIF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.


TPIF

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.55%
YTD
9.41%
6M
11.47%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
9.41%34.34%3.49%16.64%-18.07%10.42%7.21%3.65%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and SPDW is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.97

The correlation between TPIF and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPIF
SPDW

Financial Services

24.5%
22.9%

Industrials

23.6%
19.2%

Basic Materials

9.2%
7.3%

Utilities

8.5%
3.3%

Technology

7.1%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
7.8%

Energy

6.0%
5.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.5%

Financial Services

TPIF
24.5%
SPDW
22.9%

Industrials

TPIF
23.6%
SPDW
19.2%

Basic Materials

TPIF
9.2%
SPDW
7.3%

Utilities

TPIF
8.5%
SPDW
3.3%

Technology

TPIF
7.1%
SPDW
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TPIF
6.1%
SPDW
7.8%

Energy

TPIF
6.0%
SPDW
5.5%

Healthcare

TPIF
5.8%
SPDW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

TPIF
3.7%
SPDW
5.7%

Communication Services

TPIF
2.5%
SPDW
3.8%

Real Estate

TPIF
2.3%
SPDW
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPIFSPDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

2.07

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.30

2.87

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.80

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.72

10.93

-2.21

TPIF vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPIFSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.07

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.24

+0.27

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-60.02%

+26.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-11.55%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-13.53%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-30.21%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.87%

-1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-12.91%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.95%

-0.36%

Volatility

TPIF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 4.76%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPIFSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.63%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

13.17%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

15.60%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

16.49%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

17.26%

+1.03%

TPIF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPIF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.62%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TPIF and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to TPIF (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 9.38% vs 7.66% for TPIF. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for TPIF.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.62% for TPIF.

TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPIF and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer