TPIF vs. SPDW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TPIF (Timothy Plan International ETF) and SPDW (SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - TPIF tracks the Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index while SPDW tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TPIF returned 7.52%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for SPDW. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TPIF charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPDW.

Performance

TPIF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 13.29% return.

TPIF

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: -1.36%
• YTD: 8.10%
• 6M: 7.68%
• 1Y: 20.07%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: —

SPDW

• 1D: -2.99%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 13.29%
• 6M: 13.11%
• 1Y: 30.23%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 10.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	8.10%	34.34%	3.49%	16.64%	-18.07%	10.42%	7.21%	4.13%
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	13.29%	34.75%	3.55%	17.81%	-15.98%	11.45%	9.90%	4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and SPDW is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019	0.97

The correlation between TPIF and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

TPIF vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TPIF	SPDW
Industrials	25.1%	18.4%
Financial Services	23.9%	22.2%
Basic Materials	9.0%	7.3%
Utilities	8.4%	3.0%
Technology	7.6%	16.8%
Energy	6.0%	4.9%
Healthcare	5.9%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	5.4%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.9%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%

Return for Risk

TPIF vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF

TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 43
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 43
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

SPDW

SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 56
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPIF	SPDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.82	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	2.50	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.33	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.98	2.63	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.60	10.15	-2.55

TPIF vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and SPDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPIF	SPDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.02%	-60.02%	+26.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-11.55%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.64%	-13.53%	+0.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	-30.21%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.19%	-2.99%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.91%	-12.88%	+4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	2.99%	-0.34%

Volatility

TPIF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 5.09%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TPIF	SPDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	7.05%	-1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	14.59%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.30%	16.72%	-2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	16.70%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.30%	17.13%	+1.17%

TPIF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPIF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than SPDW's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPDW SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF	3.06%	3.30%	3.19%	2.75%	3.12%	3.04%	1.87%	3.13%	3.08%	1.86%	3.11%	2.78%
TPIF Timothy Plan International ETF	2.73%	2.65%	2.98%	2.40%	2.58%	2.38%	1.72%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPIF and SPDW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TPIF and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TPIF or SPDW?

SPDW has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to TPIF (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

Which ETF is better, TPIF or SPDW?

On 5-year performance, SPDW leads with 9.30% vs 7.52% for TPIF. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TPIF or SPDW?

Over the 5-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 9.30% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPIF or SPDW?

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for TPIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPIF or SPDW?

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.73% for TPIF.

What is the main difference between TPIF and SPDW?

TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.04% for SPDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.