PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPIF vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPIF vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPIF achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return.


TPIF

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.55%
YTD
9.41%
6M
11.47%
1Y
22.50%
3Y*
17.61%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*

IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPIF vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
9.41%34.34%3.49%16.64%-18.07%10.42%7.21%3.65%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TPIF and IPOS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.63

The correlation between TPIF and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPIF vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPIF
IPOS

Financial Services

24.5%
9.6%

Industrials

23.6%
15.0%

Basic Materials

9.2%
5.3%

Utilities

8.5%
3.1%

Technology

7.1%
42.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
7.1%

Energy

6.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

5.8%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Financial Services

TPIF
24.5%
IPOS
9.6%

Industrials

TPIF
23.6%
IPOS
15.0%

Basic Materials

TPIF
9.2%
IPOS
5.3%

Utilities

TPIF
8.5%
IPOS
3.1%

Technology

TPIF
7.1%
IPOS
42.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TPIF
6.1%
IPOS
7.1%

Energy

TPIF
6.0%
IPOS
4.9%

Healthcare

TPIF
5.8%
IPOS
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

TPIF
3.7%
IPOS
4.7%

Communication Services

TPIF
2.5%
IPOS
0.3%

Real Estate

TPIF
2.3%
IPOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPIF vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPIF
TPIF Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TPIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPIF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
TPIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPIF Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPIF vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPIFIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.83

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

11.58

-2.86

TPIF vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPIF Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPIF and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPIFIPOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.24

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.28

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.09

+0.42

Drawdowns

TPIF vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPIF drawdown since its inception was -34.02%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPIF and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPIFIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.02%

-73.09%

+39.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-17.17%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.64%

-34.08%

+21.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-69.93%

+37.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-40.44%

+38.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-31.99%

+24.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

5.67%

-3.08%

Volatility

TPIF vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan International ETF (TPIF) is 4.76%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that TPIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPIFIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

12.05%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.53%

26.45%

-14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.71%

29.41%

-15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.66%

27.19%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.29%

24.13%

-5.84%

TPIF vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPIF has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPIF vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

TPIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%
TPIF
Timothy Plan International ETF
2.62%2.65%2.98%2.40%2.58%2.38%1.72%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPIF and IPOS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to TPIF (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPIF dropped -34.02% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 5-year performance, TPIF leads with 7.66% vs -7.69% for IPOS. On fees, TPIF is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, TPIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TPIF has performed better with a 7.66% return vs -7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPIF is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

TPIF has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

TPIF tracks Victory International Volatility Weighted BRI Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for TPIF and 0.80% for IPOS.

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPIF and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer