PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPHAX vs. JGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPHAX vs. JGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPHAX achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than JGH's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, TPHAX has underperformed JGH with an annualized return of 5.02%, while JGH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.49% annualized return.


TPHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
5.02%

JGH

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.14%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.88%
1Y
11.18%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
8.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPHAX vs. JGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPHAX
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund
1.75%7.57%7.95%12.24%-12.24%5.69%6.12%16.60%-4.66%6.22%
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
5.23%8.62%15.98%20.89%-21.01%10.84%2.77%30.04%-12.02%15.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TPHAX and JGH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2014

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPHAX vs. JGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPHAX
TPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JGH
JGH Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGH Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGH Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPHAX vs. JGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) and Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPHAXJGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.22

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.34

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

3.26

+10.41

TPHAX vs. JGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the JGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPHAX and JGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPHAXJGHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.10

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.42

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.54

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.41

+0.50

Drawdowns

TPHAX vs. JGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPHAX drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, smaller than the maximum JGH drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPHAX and JGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPHAXJGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.48%

-43.79%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-8.37%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.94%

-13.70%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.98%

-28.66%

+12.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.38%

-43.79%

+21.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.26%

-7.00%

+3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

3.44%

-2.94%

Volatility

TPHAX vs. JGH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) is 0.87%, while Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that TPHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPHAXJGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

3.70%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

7.25%

-5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76%

10.22%

-7.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

13.79%

-9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

15.88%

-11.02%

TPHAX vs. JGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPHAX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is lower than JGH's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPHAX vs. JGH - Dividend Comparison

TPHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, less than JGH's 9.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.73%9.82%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%
TPHAX
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund
5.70%5.39%5.75%5.35%4.60%4.23%4.26%4.11%4.13%3.55%3.88%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPHAX and JGH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JGH has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to TPHAX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPHAX dropped -35.48% vs JGH's -43.79%.

TPHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPHAX and JGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer