TPHAX vs. FQTIX
TPHAX (Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund) and FQTIX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TPHAX returned 3.53%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for FQTIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPHAX charges 1.39%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQTIX.
Performance
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPHAX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 3.81% return.
TPHAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 8.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.99%
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 8.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- —
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPHAX Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund | 1.98% | 7.57% | 7.95% | 12.24% | -12.24% | 5.69% | 6.12% | 8.34% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 3.81% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPHAX and FQTIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between TPHAX and FQTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPHAX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
TPHAX
FQTIX
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.71 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.50 | -1.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 23.67 | -11.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPHAX drawdown since its inception was -35.48%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPHAX and FQTIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.48% | -24.62% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -2.20% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.94% | -6.42% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.98% | -18.81% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.12% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -4.29% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.42% | +0.08% |
Volatility
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) is 0.74%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that TPHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 0.83% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 2.43% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 3.12% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.35% | 5.94% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.86% | 7.70% | -2.84% |
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPHAX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPHAX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
TPHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than FQTIX's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 6.83% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPHAX Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund | 5.68% | 5.39% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 4.60% | 4.23% | 4.26% | 4.11% | 4.13% | 3.55% | 3.88% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPHAX and FQTIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FQTIX has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to TPHAX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPHAX dropped -35.48% vs FQTIX's -24.62%.
FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPHAX and FQTIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer