PortfoliosLab logo
JGH vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JGH and QYLD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

JGH vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JGH:

0.93

QYLD:

0.34

Sortino Ratio

JGH:

1.16

QYLD:

0.56

Omega Ratio

JGH:

1.20

QYLD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

JGH:

0.86

QYLD:

0.30

Martin Ratio

JGH:

3.39

QYLD:

1.01

Ulcer Index

JGH:

3.45%

QYLD:

5.60%

Daily Std Dev

JGH:

13.23%

QYLD:

19.16%

Max Drawdown

JGH:

-43.79%

QYLD:

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

JGH:

-3.10%

QYLD:

-9.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGH achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, JGH has underperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 6.47%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.67% annualized return.


JGH

YTD

2.82%

1M

2.69%

6M

0.05%

1Y

11.18%

3Y*

11.22%

5Y*

9.50%

10Y*

6.47%

QYLD

YTD

-5.59%

1M

1.26%

6M

-3.85%

1Y

6.20%

3Y*

9.43%

5Y*

7.91%

10Y*

7.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nuveen Global High Income Fund

JGH vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGH has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JGH vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JGH is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JGH is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JGH is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JGH is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JGH is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JGH is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JGH vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current JGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGH and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JGH vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

JGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.80%, less than QYLD's 13.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
JGH
Nuveen Global High Income Fund
9.80%9.67%10.18%12.05%8.19%7.13%7.53%9.88%8.52%9.61%11.44%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.78%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

JGH vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGH drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGH and QYLD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JGH vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.90%. This indicates that JGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...