TPFI vs. MBS
TPFI (Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPFI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.
Performance
TPFI vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 6.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPFI vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFI Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF | -0.26% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFI and MBS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFI vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
TPFI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MBS
TPFI vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF (TPFI) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFI | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFI vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFI drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFI and MBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFI | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -4.09% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.95% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.49% | -1.02% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.78% | — |
Volatility
TPFI vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFI | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 2.75% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 3.94% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 3.94% | -0.04% |
TPFI vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFI vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
TPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than MBS's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.66% | 5.28% | 4.52% |
TPFI Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFI and MBS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TPFI.
MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.70% for TPFI.
They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TPFI and 0.49% for MBS.
Find the right allocation for TPFI and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer