TPFI vs. DBND

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

TPFI (Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. TPFI is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TPFI charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.

Performance

TPFI vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF (TPFI) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TPFI

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBND

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: -0.42%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 1Y: 4.17%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPFI vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TPFI Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF	-0.26%
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TPFI and DBND is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

TPFI vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPFI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 39
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 42
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPFI vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF (TPFI) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPFI	DBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.90	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.23	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.48	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.81	—

Drawdowns

TPFI vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPFI drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFI and DBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPFI	DBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-9.39%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-1.64%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-2.25%	+1.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPFI	DBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.03%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	3.24%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.90%	5.06%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.90%	5.06%	-1.16%

TPFI vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPFI has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPFI vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

TPFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.79%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%
TPFI Timothy Plan Fixed Income ETF	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPFI and DBND in my portfolio?

TPFI and DBND have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPFI or DBND?

On fees, DBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPFI or DBND?

DBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TPFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPFI or DBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.70% for TPFI.

What is the main difference between TPFI and DBND?

They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TPFI and 0.50% for DBND.