DBND vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. DBND is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBND returned 4.44%/yr vs 4.73%/yr for FBND. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBND charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

DBND vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.72% return.

DBND

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: -0.16%
• 6M: -0.00%
• 1Y: 3.74%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBND

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.80%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 4.73%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBND vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	-0.16%	7.41%	3.06%	6.33%	-5.93%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.72%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DBND and FBND is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.91

The correlation between DBND and FBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DBND vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBND

DBND Risk / Return Rank: 31
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 32
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 35
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 33
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBND vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DBND	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.24	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	1.84	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.21	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	1.77	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	5.07	-1.47

DBND vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBND and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DBND vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBND	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.39%	-17.25%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.83%	-2.66%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.25%	-5.94%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-1.21%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-3.34%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.93%	+0.11%

Volatility

DBND vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) is 0.97%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that DBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBND	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	1.13%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	2.84%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	3.83%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.07%	5.93%	-0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.07%	6.10%	-1.03%

DBND vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBND vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than FBND's 4.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF	4.78%	4.78%	5.19%	4.39%	2.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.69%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBND and FBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, DBND and FBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DBND or FBND?

FBND has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to DBND (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which ETF is better, DBND or FBND?

On 3-year performance, FBND leads with 4.73% vs 4.44% for DBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DBND or FBND?

Over the 3-year period, FBND has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBND or FBND?

FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DBND or FBND?

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.69% for FBND.

What is the main difference between DBND and FBND?

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.36% for FBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.