PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBND vs. VPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBND vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBND achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.90% return.


DBND

1D
0.04%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.44%
5Y*
10Y*

VPLS

1D
0.10%
1M
0.72%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBND vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.16%7.41%3.06%2.22%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.90%7.86%2.72%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between DBND and VPLS is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.93

The correlation between DBND and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBND vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBND vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBNDVPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.90

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

5.92

-2.31

DBND vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBND and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBND vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBND drawdown since its inception was -9.39%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBND and VPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBNDVPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-4.17%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-2.72%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-0.96%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-1.01%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.87%

+0.17%

Volatility

DBND vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) have volatilities of 0.97% and 0.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBNDVPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.96%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.75%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

3.60%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.07%

4.59%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.07%

4.59%

+0.48%

DBND vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBND has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBND vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

DBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, which matches VPLS's 4.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.78%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.75%4.78%4.52%0.18%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, DBND and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DBND has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to VPLS (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBND dropped -9.39% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

On 1-year performance, VPLS leads with 5.14% vs 3.74% for DBND. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VPLS has performed better with a 5.14% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 4.75% for VPLS.

They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DBND and 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBND and VPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer