TPFG vs. VTI
TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TPFG tracks the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index while VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
TPFG vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFG
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 22.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
TPFG vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | -0.76% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFG and VTI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFG vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
TPFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VTI
TPFG vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFG vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -55.45% | +45.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.58% | -0.73% | -8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -8.00% | +5.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
TPFG vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFG | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.98% | 12.82% | +20.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 17.51% | +15.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.98% | 18.28% | +14.70% |
TPFG vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFG vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.05% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFG and VTI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.
TPFG tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.03% for VTI.
Find the right allocation for TPFG and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer