TPFG vs. SELV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and SELV (SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TPFG is passively managed, while SELV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SELV.

Performance

TPFG vs. SELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TPFG

• 1D: -2.66%
• 1M: -6.77%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SELV

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 2.54%
• 6M: 3.27%
• YTD: 5.03%
• 1Y: 11.14%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPFG vs. SELV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	-0.76%
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TPFG and SELV is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	-0.57

Return for Risk

TPFG vs. SELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPFG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SELV

SELV Risk / Return Rank: 41
SELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SELV Omega Ratio Rank: 38
SELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
SELV Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPFG vs. SELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF (SELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPFG	SELV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.18	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.89	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.03	—

Drawdowns

TPFG vs. SELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum SELV drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and SELV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPFG	SELV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.58%	-13.73%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.58%	0.00%	-9.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-2.37%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPFG	SELV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.98%	9.53%	+23.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.98%	11.95%	+21.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.98%	11.95%	+21.03%

TPFG vs. SELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SELV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPFG vs. SELV - Dividend Comparison

TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SELV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
SELV SEI Enhanced Low Volatility US Large Cap ETF	1.70%	1.74%	1.77%	2.06%	1.26%
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPFG and SELV in my portfolio?

TPFG and SELV have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPFG or SELV?

On fees, SELV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPFG or SELV?

SELV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPFG or SELV?

SELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.

What is the main difference between TPFG and SELV?

They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.15% for SELV.