TPFG vs. MFUS
TPFG (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPFG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while MFUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPFG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
TPFG vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFG
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MFUS
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 26.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 13.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.13M | $1.05M | $961.83K | |
| $342.29K | $184.68K | $526.09K |
TPFG vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 3.27% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFG and MFUS is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFG vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
TPFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MFUS
TPFG vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (TPFG) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFG vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFG drawdown since its inception was -13.31%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFG and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -35.21% | +21.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -0.27% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -3.95% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.69% | — |
Volatility
TPFG vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFG | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.68% | 11.53% | +20.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 15.03% | +16.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.68% | 17.29% | +14.39% |
TPFG vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFG vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
TPFG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% |
TPFG Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFG and MFUS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFG.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for TPFG.
TPFG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MFUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. TPFG tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth BRI Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFG and 0.30% for MFUS.
Find the right allocation for TPFG and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer