TPFC vs. VOE
TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TPFC tracks the Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index while VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOE.
Performance
TPFC vs. VOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 25.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
TPFC vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.27% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 6.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFC and VOE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFC vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank
TPFC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOE
TPFC vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFC | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.69 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFC vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and VOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFC | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -61.50% | +55.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | 0.00% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -8.30% | +5.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
TPFC vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFC | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 11.45% | +2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 15.96% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 18.73% | -4.43% |
TPFC vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFC vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison
TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than VOE's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFC and VOE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.
VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.
TPFC tracks Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.05% for VOE.
Find the right allocation for TPFC and VOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer