TPFC vs. SPYV
TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPFC is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
TPFC vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFC
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $160.98M | $136.63M | $153.00M | |
| $235.50K | $114.99K | $613.33K |
TPFC vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 6.86% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 6.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFC and SPYV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFC vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
TPFC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYV
TPFC vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFC vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -58.45% | +52.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -8.66% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility
TPFC vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.19% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.69% | 9.92% | +3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 14.30% | -0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 16.89% | -3.20% |
TPFC vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFC vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SPYV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFC and SPYV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.
TPFC is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. TPFC tracks Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.04% for SPYV.
Find the right allocation for TPFC and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer