TPFC vs. IVOV
TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TPFC tracks the Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index while IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
TPFC vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TPFC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- 20.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
TPFC vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.27% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 6.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPFC and IVOV is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPFC vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
TPFC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IVOV
TPFC vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPFC | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPFC vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum IVOV drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPFC | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -45.99% | +40.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | 0.00% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -5.39% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility
TPFC vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPFC | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 15.04% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 19.35% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.30% | 21.64% | -7.34% |
TPFC vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPFC vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than IVOV's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.60% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPFC and IVOV have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TPFC.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.
TPFC tracks Victory Free Cash Flow BRI Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.10% for IVOV.
Find the right allocation for TPFC and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer