TPFC vs. ABEQ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

TPFC (Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TPFC is passively managed, while ABEQ is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TPFC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.

Performance

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TPFC

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -0.86%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABEQ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 1.23%
• YTD: 4.19%
• 1Y: 10.69%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 7.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF	1.32%
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TPFC and ABEQ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

TPFC vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPFC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ABEQ

ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 35
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TPFC	ABEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.79	—

Drawdowns

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPFC drawdown since its inception was -5.82%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPFC and ABEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TPFC	ABEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-27.82%	+22.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.13%	-6.76%	+3.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-4.11%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TPFC	ABEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	9.11%	+5.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	10.80%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	13.78%	+0.67%

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPFC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TPFC vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

TPFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than ABEQ's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF	1.22%	1.25%	1.48%	2.60%	1.20%	0.60%	0.60%
TPFC Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TPFC and ABEQ in my portfolio?

TPFC and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TPFC or ABEQ?

On fees, TPFC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TPFC or ABEQ?

TPFC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TPFC or ABEQ?

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.13% for TPFC.

What is the main difference between TPFC and ABEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Timothy Plan and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TPFC and 0.85% for ABEQ.