TPE.TO vs. INTF
TPE.TO (TD International Equity Index ETF) and INTF (iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TPE.TO is a International Equity fund tracking the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR), while INTF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TPE.TO returned 10.64%/yr vs 10.97%/yr for INTF. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPE.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for INTF.
Performance
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TPE.TO is traded in CAD, while INTF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INTF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPE.TO achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly lower than INTF's 13.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPE.TO having a 10.64% annualized return and INTF not far ahead at 10.97%.
TPE.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.64%
INTF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 12.68%
- 1Y
- 28.42%
- 3Y*
- 22.61%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 11.97% | 25.30% | 12.36% | 15.65% | -9.18% | 10.41% | 6.19% | 16.38% | -6.44% | 17.27% |
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 13.05% | 29.31% | 14.97% | 15.44% | -6.75% | 11.65% | 0.39% | 13.57% | -8.79% | 19.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPE.TO and INTF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2016 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, TPE.TO and INTF have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TPE.TO
INTF
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
TPE.TO
INTF
Industrials
TPE.TO
INTF
Technology
TPE.TO
INTF
Healthcare
TPE.TO
INTF
Consumer Cyclical
TPE.TO
INTF
Consumer Defensive
TPE.TO
INTF
Basic Materials
TPE.TO
INTF
Communication Services
TPE.TO
INTF
Energy
TPE.TO
INTF
Utilities
TPE.TO
INTF
Real Estate
TPE.TO
INTF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPE.TO vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank
TPE.TO
INTF
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPE.TO | INTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.86 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 11.44 | -3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPE.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum INTF drawdown of -30.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPE.TO and INTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPE.TO | INTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.42% | -30.45% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -9.97% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.41% | -14.01% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -23.35% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.42% | -30.45% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.86% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -5.25% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 2.49% | +0.51% |
Volatility
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) is 4.60%, while iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that TPE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPE.TO | INTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.96% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.16% | 13.02% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 15.40% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 17.23% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 18.19% | -3.41% |
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPE.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPE.TO vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison
TPE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than INTF's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INTF iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF | 3.08% | 2.87% | 3.53% | 3.59% | 2.81% | 5.38% | 2.06% | 3.65% | 2.62% | 3.26% | 1.66% | 0.85% |
TPE.TO TD International Equity Index ETF | 2.09% | 2.30% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 2.89% | 2.41% | 2.42% | 2.60% | 2.93% | 2.35% | 2.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPE.TO and INTF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.
TPE.TO is categorized as International Equity, while INTF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR), while INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TPE.TO and 0.30% for INTF.
Find the right allocation for TPE.TO and INTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer