PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPE.TO vs. INTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TPE.TO is traded in CAD, while INTF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the INTF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPE.TO achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than INTF's 10.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TPE.TO having a 9.84% annualized return and INTF not far ahead at 9.95%.


TPE.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.26%
YTD
9.84%
6M
10.54%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
11.09%
10Y*
9.84%

INTF

1D
-0.43%
1M
4.50%
YTD
10.88%
6M
12.14%
1Y
26.81%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
9.84%25.30%12.36%15.65%-9.18%10.41%6.19%16.38%-6.63%17.27%
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
10.88%29.28%15.10%15.65%-6.06%10.69%1.09%12.63%-8.73%20.28%

Correlation

The correlation between TPE.TO and INTF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016

0.73

The correlation between TPE.TO and INTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPE.TO
INTF

Financial Services

24.0%
25.2%

Industrials

19.8%
19.1%

Technology

10.4%
8.5%

Healthcare

10.4%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
6.3%

Basic Materials

6.1%
6.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
3.9%

Energy

4.2%
5.9%

Utilities

3.9%
4.7%

Real Estate

2.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

TPE.TO
24.0%
INTF
25.2%

Industrials

TPE.TO
19.8%
INTF
19.1%

Technology

TPE.TO
10.4%
INTF
8.5%

Healthcare

TPE.TO
10.4%
INTF
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TPE.TO
7.8%
INTF
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

TPE.TO
6.7%
INTF
6.3%

Basic Materials

TPE.TO
6.1%
INTF
6.6%

Communication Services

TPE.TO
4.5%
INTF
3.9%

Energy

TPE.TO
4.2%
INTF
5.9%

Utilities

TPE.TO
3.9%
INTF
4.7%

Real Estate

TPE.TO
2.2%
INTF
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPE.TO vs. INTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPE.TO
TPE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

INTF
INTF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
INTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
INTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTF Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) and iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPE.TOINTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.72

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

11.46

-3.51

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the INTF Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPE.TO and INTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPE.TOINTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.99

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.96

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.68

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.61

+0.04

Drawdowns

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPE.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum INTF drawdown of -30.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPE.TO and INTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPE.TOINTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.42%

-30.10%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-9.90%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

-14.01%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-23.00%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

-30.10%

+2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-0.43%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-5.10%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

2.35%

+0.58%

Volatility

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Volatility Comparison

TD International Equity Index ETF (TPE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF (INTF) at 4.33%. This indicates that TPE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPE.TOINTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

4.33%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

11.27%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

13.55%

+1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.05%

13.26%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

14.72%

+0.18%

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPE.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INTF's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPE.TO vs. INTF - Dividend Comparison

TPE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than INTF's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTF
iShares MSCI Intl Multifactor ETF
2.62%2.87%3.53%3.59%2.81%5.38%2.06%3.65%2.62%3.26%1.66%0.85%
TPE.TO
TD International Equity Index ETF
2.13%2.30%2.37%2.66%2.89%2.41%2.42%2.60%2.94%2.35%2.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TPE.TO and INTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TPE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TPE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for INTF.

TPE.TO is categorized as International Equity, while INTF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TPE.TO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index (CA NTR), while INTF tracks MSCI World ex USA Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TPE.TO and 0.30% for INTF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPE.TO and INTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer