TPDAX vs. MDCPX
TPDAX (Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund) and MDCPX (BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, TPDAX returned 6.71%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for MDCPX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TPDAX charges 1.37%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MDCPX.
Performance
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TPDAX achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly lower than MDCPX's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, TPDAX has underperformed MDCPX with an annualized return of 6.71%, while MDCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.
TPDAX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.71%
MDCPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 19.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 7.48% | 23.97% | 5.29% | 7.71% | -5.63% | 12.15% | 8.83% | 13.77% | -7.24% | 4.14% |
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares | 8.29% | 15.32% | 12.47% | 16.59% | -15.70% | 16.49% | 15.07% | 21.59% | -3.48% | 14.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TPDAX and MDCPX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2009 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TPDAX and MDCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TPDAX vs. MDCPX — Risk / Return Rank
TPDAX
MDCPX
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TPDAX | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.11 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 13.15 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TPDAX drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum MDCPX drawdown of -41.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPDAX and MDCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TPDAX | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -41.98% | +19.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -6.22% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.58% | -10.65% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.58% | -21.99% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.29% | -24.58% | +2.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.56% | -0.64% | -5.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -5.09% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 1.46% | +1.01% |
Volatility
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Volatility Comparison
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TPDAX | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 3.50% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 7.36% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.53% | 8.77% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.22% | 11.14% | -0.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.93% | 11.50% | -1.57% |
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TPDAX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than MDCPX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
TPDAX vs. MDCPX - Dividend Comparison
TPDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than MDCPX's 7.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares | 7.95% | 8.61% | 7.44% | 2.63% | 3.82% | 12.27% | 4.02% | 5.25% | 7.84% | 19.39% | 4.67% | 5.04% |
TPDAX Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund | 0.75% | 0.80% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 4.48% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 2.89% | 2.69% | 0.13% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TPDAX and MDCPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDCPX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to TPDAX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPDAX dropped -22.29% vs MDCPX's -41.98%.
MDCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TPDAX and MDCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer