TOV vs. SPXM
TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TOV is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 21.75% vs 8.61% for SPXM. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
TOV vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TOV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOV vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 11.07% | 10.26% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOV and SPXM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TOV and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOV vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
TOV
SPXM
TOV vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOV | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 2.09 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 9.77 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOV vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOV | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.97% | -5.08% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -5.08% | -3.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.75% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -0.78% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility
TOV vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that TOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOV | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 0.00% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.28% | 3.96% | +6.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 7.66% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 7.63% | +10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 7.63% | +10.14% |
TOV vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOV vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 0.85% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOV and SPXM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOV has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.97% vs SPXM's -5.08%.
On 1-year performance, TOV leads with 21.75% vs 8.61% for SPXM. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TOV has performed better with a 21.75% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.
TOV has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.
They also come from different issuers: JLens and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.47% for SPXM.
TOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOV and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer