TOV vs. SUPP
TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and SUPP (TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. TOV is passively managed, while SUPP is actively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 28.12% vs 32.28% for SUPP. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SUPP.
Performance
TOV vs. SUPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOV achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than SUPP's 21.37% return.
TOV
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUPP
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOV vs. SUPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 11.31% | 17.49% |
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 21.37% | 15.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOV and SUPP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TOV and SUPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
TOV vs. SUPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOV
SUPP
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
TOV
SUPP
Financial Services
TOV
SUPP
-
Communication Services
TOV
SUPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
TOV
SUPP
Healthcare
TOV
SUPP
-
Industrials
TOV
SUPP
Consumer Defensive
TOV
SUPP
-
Energy
TOV
SUPP
-
Utilities
TOV
SUPP
-
Real Estate
TOV
SUPP
-
Basic Materials
TOV
SUPP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOV vs. SUPP — Risk / Return Rank
TOV
SUPP
TOV vs. SUPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOV | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.39 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.17 | 9.82 | +4.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOV | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.68 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.89 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
TOV vs. SUPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum SUPP drawdown of -25.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and SUPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOV | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -25.03% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -13.59% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.15% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -4.41% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 3.29% | -1.30% |
Volatility
TOV vs. SUPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) is 3.72%, while TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF (SUPP) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that TOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOV | SUPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 7.15% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 16.42% | -7.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 19.38% | -7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 19.44% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 19.44% | -1.57% |
TOV vs. SUPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SUPP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TOV vs. SUPP - Dividend Comparison
TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than SUPP's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SUPP TCW Transform Supply Chain ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.49% | 0.45% |
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 0.82% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOV and SUPP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUPP has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to TOV (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.28% vs SUPP's -25.03%.
On 1-year performance, SUPP leads with 32.28% vs 28.12% for TOV. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SUPP has performed better with a 32.28% return vs 28.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUPP.
TOV has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.29% for SUPP.
They also come from different issuers: JLens and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.75% for SUPP.
TOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOV and SUPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer