TOV vs. FNDB
TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 28.54% vs 33.57% for FNDB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
TOV vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOV achieves a 11.66% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 15.31% return.
TOV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 11.66%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
TOV vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 11.66% | 17.49% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 15.31% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOV and FNDB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between TOV and FNDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
TOV vs. FNDB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TOV
FNDB
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
TOV
FNDB
Financial Services
TOV
FNDB
Communication Services
TOV
FNDB
Consumer Cyclical
TOV
FNDB
Healthcare
TOV
FNDB
Industrials
TOV
FNDB
Consumer Defensive
TOV
FNDB
Energy
TOV
FNDB
Utilities
TOV
FNDB
Real Estate
TOV
FNDB
Basic Materials
TOV
FNDB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOV vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
TOV
FNDB
TOV vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TOV | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.58 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 5.36 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.38 | 20.60 | -6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOV | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 3.15 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.79 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
TOV vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOV | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -38.17% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.29% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -3.66% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 1.63% | +0.36% |
Volatility
TOV vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) at 2.28%. This indicates that TOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOV | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 2.28% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 7.63% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 10.73% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 15.36% | +2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 17.48% | +0.36% |
TOV vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TOV vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FNDB's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF | 0.82% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOV and FNDB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOV has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FNDB (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.28% vs FNDB's -38.17%.
On 1-year performance, FNDB leads with 33.57% vs 28.54% for TOV. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 33.57% return vs 28.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.82% for TOV.
TOV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. They also come from different issuers: JLens and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.25% for FNDB.
FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TOV and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer