TOV vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TOV (JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TOV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TOV returned 23.74% vs 27.76% for ENFR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TOV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

TOV vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOV achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

TOV

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 23.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOV vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	8.54%	14.91%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TOV and ENFR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.13

The correlation between TOV and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TOV vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TOV	ENFR
Technology	39.4%	-
Financial Services	11.1%	0.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.0%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Energy	3.2%	98.5%
Utilities	2.0%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

TOV vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOV

TOV Risk / Return Rank: 63
TOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
TOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TOV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
TOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TOV Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOV vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TOV	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.88	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.59	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	3.23	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	8.24	+3.28

TOV vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TOV and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TOV vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOV drawdown since its inception was -16.97%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOV and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TOV	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.97%	-68.28%	+51.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-8.64%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-4.71%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-15.94%	+13.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.38%	-1.31%

Volatility

TOV vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF (TOV) is 4.65%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that TOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TOV	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.69%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	11.60%	-1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	14.86%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.01%	19.25%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	24.68%	-6.67%

TOV vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TOV vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

TOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
TOV JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. ETF	0.84%	0.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TOV and ENFR in my portfolio?

TOV and ENFR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TOV or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to TOV (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TOV dropped -16.97% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, TOV or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.76% vs 23.74% for TOV. On fees, TOV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TOV or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 23.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TOV or ENFR?

TOV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TOV or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.84% for TOV.

What is the main difference between TOV and ENFR?

TOV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. TOV tracks JLens 500 Jewish Advocacy U.S. Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: JLens and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for TOV and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.