PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOT vs. PGRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOT vs. PGRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TOT

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.24%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PGRI

1D
-1.21%
1M
-3.67%
6M
2.15%
YTD
6.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOT vs. PGRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOT and PGRI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOT vs. PGRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LionShares U.S. Equity Total Return ETF (TOT) and Putnam International Stock ETF (PGRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOT vs. PGRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TOT vs. PGRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOT drawdown since its inception was -4.26%, smaller than the maximum PGRI drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOT and PGRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOTPGRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-12.87%

+8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-5.78%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.33%

-3.09%

+1.76%

Volatility

TOT vs. PGRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOTPGRIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

20.74%

-7.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

20.74%

-7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.52%

20.74%

-7.22%

TOT vs. PGRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PGRI's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOT vs. PGRI - Dividend Comparison

TOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PGRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TOT and PGRI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PGRI.

PGRI has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for TOT.

They also come from different issuers: LionShares and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for TOT and 0.55% for PGRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOT and PGRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer